Live coordination for energy performance

Energy efficiency coordination should not feel like a game of telephone.

BIMergy ™ is being built to reduce the gap between the project model, the energy assessment, the drawings, the product selections, the construction notes, and the final report. The goal is simple: one model, faster design feedback, and one source of truth.

Still in development, but the direction is clear. Less fragmented coordination. Faster decisions. Documentation that follows the project instead of being rebuilt at the end.

What BIMergy ™ Is Trying To Solve

Energy performance should stay connected as the design changes.

Too often, the project model, drawings, NatHERS assessment, glazing data, construction notes, and final compliance report all become separate moving parts. Each one might be technically correct in isolation, but the real challenge is keeping them coordinated while the building changes.

The Aim

One model. One source of truth.

BIMergy ™ is being developed so the energy model is not a separate file sitting beside the architectural model. The aim is for energy analysis, NatHERS feedback, envelope decisions, glazing inputs, construction selections, and reporting logic to connect back to the coordinated model the project team is already working from.

When the target is a strong rating outcome, such as 7 Stars, the speed and timing of feedback matters. BIMergy™ is intended to move key energy decisions earlier in the design process, where they are easier to test, explain, and coordinate.

Traditional Workflow

  • Prepare a project model and separate 2D documentation.
  • Issue files to the energy assessor or ESD consultant.
  • Wait for assessment feedback after design decisions are made.
  • Revise the model, drawings, notes, schedules, and report.
  • Repeat handovers until the documentation lines up.

BIMergy™ Workflow

  • Connect the model to live energy and NatHERS feedback.
  • Coordinate glazing, envelope, and material decisions sooner.
  • Keep documentation connected to the current project data.
  • Reduce repeated handovers and manual rework.
  • Help teams finish with coordinated, report-ready information.
For architectsfaster design feedback while the model is still moving.
For buildersclearer coordination between performance intent and delivery.
For assessorsless disconnected data entry and more traceable decisions.
For suppliersbetter pathways for product data to inform real projects.